Described as a palm leaf, but not a palm and probably a cycad according to Read & Hickey, 1972. [details]
Originally described as a palm, but affinity unknown (not a palm) according to Read & Hickey, 1972. [details]
Described as a palm but this assignation is doubtful according to Read & Hickey, 1972. [details]
Remains are fragmentary and not possible to allocate to any particular group, refer Read & Hickey, 1972. [details]
Has in the past been assigned to fossil palms; probably a cone of Williamsonia according to Read & Hickey, 1972. [details]