Although Hull (1962: 226) and Neave (1939a: 614) both listed this spelling as a lapsus for ... [details]
In a later publication, Bigot indicates this name as a (unjustified) replacement name for Mesoblepharius Bigot, ... [details]
err. pro Yeto- Rondani 1861 (Nomen. Zool.). This is not the first use of this misspelling. which is to be found in ... [details]
This is an incorrect subsequent speling in predominant usage. Authors like Neave and Agassiz have considered that ... [details]
pro Megystostylus Bigot 1859 (Nomen. Zool.). Recorded from Bigot, 1888 in Neave, but the spelling was already in ... [details]
See Merapioidus (Nomen. Zool.). misspelling/variant spelling. This index was published separately (24 March 1880) ... [details]
pro -mya Bigot 1857 (Nomen. Zool.). This misspelling was already found in Melander (1902). [details]
Oedipsilopus is the correct spelling, not Aedipsilopus as quoted in Neave. [details]
Neave cites this name from Scudder, but it is not in the purported place of publication. [details]
This name is the correct spelling, not -mya, as asserted in Neave. [details]
Not an emendation of Paracleius Bigot, but rather a separate genus with a name chosen to be similar. [details]
Although Evenhuis & Pont (2004:55) declare this an available name, there does not seem to be reason enough to treat ... [details]
pro Vertexistemma Bigot 1856 (Nomen. Zool.). Evenhuis et Pont (2004:61) consider this name an unjustified ... [details]
This name as often been listed as available. [details]