Fossil spore bearing bodies, Miocene, comparable with Phialophora, a hyphomycetous taxon. [details]
Family assignment in IRMNG as per extant Ampulliferina B. Sutton 1969 with which the genus is compared in the ... [details]
Originally described as fossil fungus (mycelium plus spores); presently assigned to Sporae dispersae as per ... [details]
Also as Asyreamspora (misspelling) on p. 185 of original work; corrected by Jansonius & Hills (1981), refer Saxena ... [details]
Spores listed as fungal in Saxena et al., 2021, however these authors note: Elsik (1992) indicated that the spore ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: According to Kalgutkar & Jansonius (2000), different species of Dictyosporites are ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Dictyosporiminites intermedium [the type and sole assigned species to date] can be ... [details]
Name corrected from original incorrect spelling, Dictyostromata, refer Saxena et al., 2021. Originally described as ... [details]
Original incorrect spelling; correct is Dictyostroma according to Saxena et al., 2021 (currently treated as a a ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Type: D. saccatus Sal.-Cheb. & Locq. 1980. ... This species was described as ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Kalgutkar (1993) validated the name Diplodites to encompass fossil taxa that are ... [details]
From original description: "fungal or algal spores". [details]
Authority previously given (in Index Fungorum) as Kalgutkar & Jansonius, 2000, in error. From Saxena et al., 2021: ... [details]
As fossil fungal spores in Saxena et al., 2021. From that work: Kalgutkar & Jansonius (2000) remarked “The ... [details]
Cretaceous-Tertiary?; Fungal Spores. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [as Dyadosporites T. van der Hammen, 1954]. From ... [details]
Listed as Algae (?) in Index Nominum Genericorum, however treated as a fungus in other sources e.g. in Saxena et ... [details]
As Acritarcha in Index Nominum Genericorum; presently treated as Sporae dispersae (as fossil fungal spores) in ... [details]
This genus contained both fossil angiosperm and fungal spores. From Saxena et al., 2021: (the type species, G. ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Original Diagnosis: In this genus are included fossil forms of which the external ... [details]
Genus not listed in Index Nominum Genericorum. Appear to be described as fossil spores of Uredinales (rust fungi); ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Eisenack (1979) suggested affinity to the Algae. Kalgutkar & Jansonius (2000) considered ... [details]
Authority previously given in Index Fungorum as Hammen ex Rouse 1959. From Saxena et al., 2021: Rouse (1959) ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Rouse (1959) incorrectly considered the generic name Inapertisporites Hammen 1954 as not ... [details]
Fossil fungal conidia containing spores; alternatively, could be treated as fossil fungus. From Saxena et al., ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Jain & Kar (1979) opined that the parallel ribs seem to be septate fungal mycelia ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Muller (1959) recorded a characteristic unicellular fungal spore, having several verrucae ... [details]
Genus spelled Octosporonites in Index Fungorum (2009 version), Octosporites in Saxena et al., 2021 and in Jansonius ... [details]
Junior homonym of Ornatisporites E. Nagy, 1963 (fossil spores); a synonym of Monoporisporites T. van der Hammen, ... [details]
From original description: Conidiogenous [fossil] fungus having characters of extant genera Helminthosporium, ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: the genus was not validly published because its type species was not validly published ... [details]
Colonial and constructed of tight bunches of thin-walled oval to spherical cells, treated as Chlorophyta incertae ... [details]
"Fungal remains of globular to elongate shape, consisting of numerous more or less polygonal cells that are firmly ... [details]
Fungal "fruiting body", sometimes with hyphae-like filaments; listed as Sporae dispersae in Index Nominum ... [details]
Described as fossil acritarch (?marine). but treated as a fungal spore by Saxena et al., 2021, following Elsik, 1992. [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: the type species, P. psilatus Pierce 1961, is a gymnospermous pollen whereas P. ovalis ... [details]
Genus contains both angiosperm pollen and fungal spores. From Saxena et al., 2021: Varma & Rawat (1963) described ... [details]
This genus could be allocated either to fossil fungi (since the original description referred to hyphae) or to ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: The generic name was not validly published for lack of a statement where the type was ... [details]
Emendation of Stridiporosporites P. Ke & Z.Y. Shi, 1978, with different proposed type (S. dolium), therefore a ... [details]
From Saxena et al., 2021: Song in Song et al. (1999) formulated an emended diagnosis, and simultaneously proposed ... [details]