| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsMucilago Battarra, 1755
1065316 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1065316)
accepted
Genus
Spumaria Persoon, 1792 · unaccepted
Spumaria Persoon in J.F. Gmelin, 1792 · unaccepted
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Leontyev et al., 2019: Mucilago may be only an aethalioid form of Didymium and thus might not deserve generic rank....
Taxonomic remark From Leontyev et al., 2019: Mucilago may be only an aethalioid form of Didymium and thus might not deserve generic rank. However, in the phylogeny of Nandipati et al. (2012), it occurs as a separate clade. The position of M. crustacea in our phylogeny also seems to support a separate genus. [details]
IRMNG (2024). Mucilago Battarra, 1755. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1065316 on 2024-12-02
Date action by
basis of record
Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details]
basis of record SN2000/Dykstra & Keller, 2000 [details] verified source for family Leontyev, D. V.; Schnittler, M.; Stephenson, S. L.; Novozhilov, Y. K.; Shchepin, O. N. (2019). Towards a phylogenetic classification of the Myxomycetes. <em>Phytotaxa.</em> 399(3): 209-238., available online at https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.399.3.5 [details] current name source Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] extant flag source Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] original description (of Spumaria Persoon, 1792) Neu Mag. Bot. 1 page(s): 88 [details] original description (of Spumaria Persoon in J.F. Gmelin, 1792) in Gmelin, Systema Naturae, Edn 13 2: 1466 [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From Leontyev et al., 2019: Mucilago may be only an aethalioid form of Didymium and thus might not deserve generic rank. However, in the phylogeny of Nandipati et al. (2012), it occurs as a separate clade. The position of M. crustacea in our phylogeny also seems to support a separate genus. [details]
|
