| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsAbieticedripites V.S. Maljavkina, 1958 †
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Ames et al., 1976: Abieticedripites was monotypic in 1958, and A. compactus was its implied type species. The choice...
Taxonomic remark From Ames et al., 1976: Abieticedripites was monotypic in 1958, and A. compactus was its implied type species. The choice of generic name is between the extant genus Cedrus and the fossil Abieticedripites. Art. 58, 1972 ICBN recognizes the priority of names of extant plants over those of fossils when taxa of the same rank are united. Abieticedripites might therefore be considered a synonym of Cedrus if A. compactus can be referred to both genera. However, on the basis of taxonomic judgement, one palynologist might choose to refer the species to the extant genus and another might prefer to use the organ genus--both could be maintained simultaneously. Abieticedripites might, however, still prove superfluous, as a synonym of Cedripites Wodehouse 1933. Although Potonié (1960, p. 79) considers Abieticedripites to be an ambiguous mono- to bisaccate genus, Malyavkina certainly indicated its morphological similarity to Cedrus. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Abieticedripites V.S. Maljavkina, 1958 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1086335 on 2024-06-22
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
status source Ames, H. T.; Traverse, A.; Spackman, W. (1976). Catalog of Fossil Spores and Pollen. Volume 40. Triassic-Cretaceous Spores and Pollen. Pennsylvania State University, 243 pp. plus prefaces. note: refer note [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] current name source Zhang, J.; Lenz, O. K.; Wang, P.; Hornung, J. (2021). The Eco-Plant model and its implication on Mesozoic dispersed sporomorphs for Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, and Gymnosperms. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 293: 104503., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2021.104503 note: in "Appendix A Uncertain [can not be linked to any specific extant or fossil plants] dispersed spores and pollen" [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Descriptive info Cretaceous. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark From Ames et al., 1976: Abieticedripites was monotypic in 1958, and A. compactus was its implied type species. The choice of generic name is between the extant genus Cedrus and the fossil Abieticedripites. Art. 58, 1972 ICBN recognizes the priority of names of extant plants over those of fossils when taxa of the same rank are united. Abieticedripites might therefore be considered a synonym of Cedrus if A. compactus can be referred to both genera. However, on the basis of taxonomic judgement, one palynologist might choose to refer the species to the extant genus and another might prefer to use the organ genus--both could be maintained simultaneously. Abieticedripites might, however, still prove superfluous, as a synonym of Cedripites Wodehouse 1933. Although Potonié (1960, p. 79) considers Abieticedripites to be an ambiguous mono- to bisaccate genus, Malyavkina certainly indicated its morphological similarity to Cedrus. [details] Type species as cited A. compacta V. S. Maljavkina [details] |
