| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsTaeniopteris A.T. Brongniart, 1828 †
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Novikoff & Barabasz-Krasny, 2015 refer this genus to Crossozamiaceae in Cycadales, however according to Van...
Taxonomic remark Novikoff & Barabasz-Krasny, 2015 refer this genus to Crossozamiaceae in Cycadales, however according to Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert et al., 2017, the name should be retained only for leaves un-attributable to one of the major plant groups; where so attributable, they should be allocated to other genera in (e.g.) ferns, cycads or bennettites, as appropriate. Zijlstra et al., 2016 proposed conserving Taeniopteris with a new type (an alternative to an earlier proposal by Doweld, 2013) to permit its continued use and not be a synonym of Marandoidea Jaeger, 1827, a proposal that was recommended for acceptance by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (Herendeen, 2017). [details]
IRMNG (2023). Taeniopteris A.T. Brongniart, 1828 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1094056 on 2024-12-01
Date action by
basis of record
Museum Victoria KEmu database (Oct 2006) [details]
additional source Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ note: as Crossozamiaceae, however refer not [details] additional source Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 note: did not accept Doweld's (2013) proposal; see also Herendeen, 2017 [details] additional source Zijlstra, G.; Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J. H.; Cleal, C. J. (2016). (2438–2439) Proposal to conserve the names Taeniopteris and T. vittata with a conserved type (fossil Tracheophyta: 'Taeniopterides'). <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 399-400., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.30 note: as nom. cons. prop. [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2249–2250) Proposals to conserve the names Taeniopteris with a conserved type and T. vittata with a conserved type (fossil Gymnospermae: Cycadeoideopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(6): 1348-1349., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/626.35 note: as nom. cons. prop., however see Herendeen, 2016 and 2017 [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 11. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(1): 193-196., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/661.17 [details] verified source for family Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J. H.; Pott, C.; Cleal, C. J.; Zijlstra, G. (2017). Differentiation of the fossil leaves assigned to Taeniopteris, Nilssoniopteris and Nilssonia with a comparison to similar genera. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 237: 100-106., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.11.009 [details] current name source Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Foliage; Jurassic; Stonesfield, Oxfordshire, England. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Novikoff & Barabasz-Krasny, 2015 refer this genus to Crossozamiaceae in Cycadales, however according to Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert et al., 2017, the name should be retained only for leaves un-attributable to one of the major plant groups; where so attributable, they should be allocated to other genera in (e.g.) ferns, cycads or bennettites, as appropriate. Zijlstra et al., 2016 proposed conserving Taeniopteris with a new type (an alternative to an earlier proposal by Doweld, 2013) to permit its continued use and not be a synonym of Marandoidea Jaeger, 1827, a proposal that was recommended for acceptance by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (Herendeen, 2017). [details] |
