| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsCheirolepidiaceae Takhtajan ex Turutanova-Ketova, 1963 †
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Included in Araucariaceae by Novikoff & Barabasz-Krasny, 2015, however maintained as a distinct family by Taylor et al.,...
Taxonomic remark Included in Araucariaceae by Novikoff & Barabasz-Krasny, 2015, however maintained as a distinct family by Taylor et al., 2009 and other sources. Doweld, 2020 proposes that Cheirolepidiaceae be replaced by Hirmeriellaceae, nom. cons. prop., since according this source, Cheirolepidium has been subsumed into synonymy with Hirmeriella. Zhang et al., 2021 place this family in its own order, Cheirolepidiales; according to Doweld, if this placement is accepted, the correct name for the order should be Hirmeriellales Doweld, 2001, which has priority over Cheirolepidiales J.M. Anderson & H.M. Anderson, 2007. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Cheirolepidiaceae Takhtajan ex Turutanova-Ketova, 1963 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=112221 on 2024-11-20
Date action by
basis of record
Benton, M.J. (ed). (1993). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp. [details]
additional source Doweld, A. B. (2020). The controversial nomenclature of the fossil plant names Cheirolepis, Cheirolepidium and Hirmeriella (Cheirolepidaceae/Cheirolepidiaceae/Hirmeriellaceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 69(5): 1092-1098., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12287 note: proposes that Cheirolepidiaceae be replaced by Hirmeriellaceae, refer note [details] taxonomy source Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ note: as Hirmeirellaceae, included in Araucariaceae [details] name verified source Doweld, A. B. (2020). The controversial nomenclature of the fossil plant names Cheirolepis, Cheirolepidium and Hirmeriella (Cheirolepidaceae/Cheirolepidiaceae/Hirmeriellaceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 69(5): 1092-1098., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12287 [details] current name source Taylor, T. N.; Taylor, E. L.; Krings, M. (2009). Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. Second Edition. Academic Press, 1252 pp. , available online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780123739728 [details] extant flag source Benton, M.J. (ed). (1993). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp. [details] habitat flag source Benton, M.J. (ed). (1993). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp. [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Benton, 1993 habitat flag(s): T; stratigraphic range: Triassic (Carnian)-Cretaceous (Campanian) [details]Taxonomic remark Included in Araucariaceae by Novikoff & Barabasz-Krasny, 2015, however maintained as a distinct family by Taylor et al., 2009 and other sources. Doweld, 2020 proposes that Cheirolepidiaceae be replaced by Hirmeriellaceae, nom. cons. prop., since according this source, Cheirolepidium has been subsumed into synonymy with Hirmeriella. Zhang et al., 2021 place this family in its own order, Cheirolepidiales; according to Doweld, if this placement is accepted, the correct name for the order should be Hirmeriellales Doweld, 2001, which has priority over Cheirolepidiales J.M. Anderson & H.M. Anderson, 2007. [details] |
