| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsEnteridiidae Farr, 1982
115715 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:115715)
unaccepted (zoological spelling; botanical treatment currently preferred in IRMNG)
Family
recent only
Farr, M. L. (1982). Notes on Myxomycetes. III. <em>Mycologia.</em> 74(2): 339-343., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1982.12021512
note: as Enteridiaceae [details]
Taxonomic remark The correct name of this family is confused at the present time. Being an ambiregnal taxon, it has been named in both...
Taxonomic remark The correct name of this family is confused at the present time. Being an ambiregnal taxon, it has been named in both botany and zoology. In botany, the correct name according to Lado & Eliasson, 2017 is Reticulariaceae Chevallier, 1826 ex Corda, 1842, with alternative names including Tubiferaceae Macbride, 1922 and Enteridiaceae Farr, 1982, of which Kirk et al., 2008 (Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th edition) cites Tubiferaceae as an accepted name with Reticulariaceae as a synonym of the latter. In zoology, Reticulariidae may have priority but is in current use for a family of fossil brachiopods (Waagen, 1883), while Tubiferidae (first proposed by Poche, 1913) is preoccupied by Tubiferidae Cossman, 1895, a family of fossil gastropods. Cavalier-Smith et al., 2004 and Ruggiero, 2014 both use Enteridiidae for this taxon in zoological nomenclature (misspelled as Enteriidae in Cavalier-Smith et al.), despite the fact that the type genus Enteridium is a nom. rej. in botany in favour of Reticularia; this name will be used in IRMNG from now on unless or until any other developments occur. (Tony Rees, May 2019) [details]
IRMNG (2023). Enteridiidae Farr, 1982. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=115715 on 2024-11-03
Date action by
original description
Farr, M. L. (1982). Notes on Myxomycetes. III. <em>Mycologia.</em> 74(2): 339-343., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1982.12021512
note: as Enteridiaceae [details] basis of record Brands, S. J. (compiler). (1989-2005). Systema Naturae 2000. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006 version). Originally available online at http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/; for current information, refer http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/ProjectDescription.aspx . [details] additional source Ruggiero, M. A. (2014). Families of All Living Organisms, Version 2.0.a.15, (4/26/14). Expert Solutions International, LLC, Reston, VA. 420 pp. [details] extant flag source Systema Naturae 2000 (2006 version) [details] habitat flag source Lee, J. J.; Leedale, G. F.; Bradbury, P. (Editors). (2000). The Illustrated Guide to the Protozoa, Second Edition. Society of Protozoologists, Lawrence Kansas, 2 volumes, 1432 pp. [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark The correct name of this family is confused at the present time. Being an ambiregnal taxon, it has been named in both botany and zoology. In botany, the correct name according to Lado & Eliasson, 2017 is Reticulariaceae Chevallier, 1826 ex Corda, 1842, with alternative names including Tubiferaceae Macbride, 1922 and Enteridiaceae Farr, 1982, of which Kirk et al., 2008 (Dictionary of the Fungi, 10th edition) cites Tubiferaceae as an accepted name with Reticulariaceae as a synonym of the latter. In zoology, Reticulariidae may have priority but is in current use for a family of fossil brachiopods (Waagen, 1883), while Tubiferidae (first proposed by Poche, 1913) is preoccupied by Tubiferidae Cossman, 1895, a family of fossil gastropods. Cavalier-Smith et al., 2004 and Ruggiero, 2014 both use Enteridiidae for this taxon in zoological nomenclature (misspelled as Enteriidae in Cavalier-Smith et al.), despite the fact that the type genus Enteridium is a nom. rej. in botany in favour of Reticularia; this name will be used in IRMNG from now on unless or until any other developments occur. (Tony Rees, May 2019) [details]
|
