IRMNG taxon details
original description
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2013). Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. <em>European Journal of Protistology.</em> 49(2): 115-178., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001 [details]
basis of record
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2013). Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. <em>European Journal of Protistology.</em> 49(2): 115-178., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001 [details]
additional source
Yubuki, N.; Zadrobílková, E.; Čepička, I. (2017). Ultrastructure and molecular phylogeny of <i>Iotanema spirale</i> gen. nov. et sp. nov., a new lineage of endobiotic Fornicata with strikingly simplified ultrastructure. <em>Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.</em> 64(4): 422-433., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12376 note: possibly mis-placed in Eopharyngea, refer note [details]
taxonomy source
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2013). Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. <em>European Journal of Protistology.</em> 49(2): 115-178., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001 note: as incertae sedis in Eopharyngea [details]
current name source
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2013). Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. <em>European Journal of Protistology.</em> 49(2): 115-178., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001 [details]
extant flag source
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2013). Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa. <em>European Journal of Protistology.</em> 49(2): 115-178., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001 [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Treated as incertae sedis in Eopharyngea by Cavalier-Smith, however Yubuki et al., 2017 state: The Fornicata are divided into three main groups: the diplomonads, retortamonads, and Carpediemonas-like organisms (CLOs). ... Since sequence data of Caviomonas are unavailable, it is impossible to examine its molecular phylogenetic position within the Fornicata . Nevertheless, the morphological similarity between the flagellar apparatus of Caviomonas and Iotanema leads us to consider them as close relatives, and we include Iotanema gen. nov. in the family Caviomonadidae Cavalier-Smith, 2013. If this is true, Caviomonas is neither a diplomonad nor a member of Eopharyngea as inferred by the previous authors and represents , together with Iotanema , a separate offshoot of CLOs. [details]
| |