| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsErythroconis A.S. Ørsted, 1842
1284843 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1284843)
unaccepted
Genus
fresh
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Originally described as alga according to ING. Listed as cyanophyte in AlgaeBase (syn. of Merismopedia),...
Taxonomic remark Originally described as alga according to ING. Listed as cyanophyte in AlgaeBase (syn. of Merismopedia), unidentifiable/excluded in CyanoDB, and bacterium in BIOS. Unaccepted name (no current standing in Prokaryotic nomenclature). Authority cited elsewhere (e.g. At species level) as Oersted, 1841. The generic name is retained in botanical nomenclature for purposes of homonymy. In IRMNG, listed as a syn. of Erythroconis since E. littoralis Oersted, 1841 is considered a syn. of Thiopedia rosea Winogradsky, 1888, refer e.g. Forest et al., 2015 in J.A. Bloomfield (ed), Lakes of New York State: Ecology of the Finger Lakes. Those authors state: "Certain bacteria are similar in form [to Merismopedia] ... and specimens of these bacteria have been the basis for some of the described species of Merismopedia. The earliest name of the commonly confused bacterial species is Erythroconis littoralis Oerst., but it is generally known as Thiopedia rosea Winogrdsky." [details]
IRMNG (2021). Erythroconis A.S. Ørsted, 1842. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1284843 on 2025-01-13
Date action by 2016-11-22 09:43:47Z changed db_admin
basis of record
CyanoDB [details]
basis of record CoL2006/BIOS [details] source of synonymy CoL2006/BIOS note: as per included species [details] extant flag source CoL2006/BIOS [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Originally described as alga according to ING. Listed as cyanophyte in AlgaeBase (syn. of Merismopedia), unidentifiable/excluded in CyanoDB, and bacterium in BIOS. Unaccepted name (no current standing in Prokaryotic nomenclature). Authority cited elsewhere (e.g. At species level) as Oersted, 1841. The generic name is retained in botanical nomenclature for purposes of homonymy. In IRMNG, listed as a syn. of Erythroconis since E. littoralis Oersted, 1841 is considered a syn. of Thiopedia rosea Winogradsky, 1888, refer e.g. Forest et al., 2015 in J.A. Bloomfield (ed), Lakes of New York State: Ecology of the Finger Lakes. Those authors state: "Certain bacteria are similar in form [to Merismopedia] ... and specimens of these bacteria have been the basis for some of the described species of Merismopedia. The earliest name of the commonly confused bacterial species is Erythroconis littoralis Oerst., but it is generally known as Thiopedia rosea Winogrdsky." [details]
|
