| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsPinites Lindley & W. Hutton, 1832 †
1348953 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1348953)
accepted
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark This was published before the validation of the names of three species (l.c. 1: 1-14, t. 1-3. 1 Jul 1831) by Witham in...
Taxonomic remark This was published before the validation of the names of three species (l.c. 1: 1-14, t. 1-3. 1 Jul 1831) by Witham in 1833. (Index Nominum Genericorum). Doweld, 2013, proposed its rejection on grounds of nomenclatural stability, then subsequently (2017) a formal acceptance of its valid publication status. The Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (2020) voted to recommend that the name Pinites was validly published, but not that it should be rejected, on the grounds that its type species Pinites eggensis was not considered by Doweld and did not threaten Pitys. They commented that the distinction between Pinites and Peuce Lindley & W. Hutton, 1832 "was likely a preservational artefact" but that no formal synonymization had yet been proposed; that being the case, the genus in IRMNG is placed in Araucariaceae (as per Peuce); the latter is presently treated as a synonym of Agathoxylon, per Rößler et al., 2014. However, Philippe & Bamford, 2008 state that the lectotype is Cordaitalean. (Not further researched) [details]
IRMNG (2022). Pinites Lindley & W. Hutton, 1832 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1348953 on 2024-10-23
Date action by
basis of record
Museum Victoria KEmu database (Oct 2006) [details]
basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2017). (59) Request for a binding decision on the descriptive statement associated with Pinites (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(6): 1483-1483., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/666.27 [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2251) Proposal to conserve Pitys, nom. cons., against Pinites (fossil Gymnospermae: Lyginopteridopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(6): 1349-1350., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/626.36 note: as nom. rej. prop., not accepted, refer note [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 13. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(2): 398-402., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12218 [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] current name source Philippe, M.; Bamford, M. K. (2008). A key to morphogenera used for Mesozoic conifer-like woods. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 148(2-4): 184-207., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2007.09.004 [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Wood; Tertiary; Inner Hebrides, Scotland. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark This was published before the validation of the names of three species (l.c. 1: 1-14, t. 1-3. 1 Jul 1831) by Witham in 1833. (Index Nominum Genericorum). Doweld, 2013, proposed its rejection on grounds of nomenclatural stability, then subsequently (2017) a formal acceptance of its valid publication status. The Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (2020) voted to recommend that the name Pinites was validly published, but not that it should be rejected, on the grounds that its type species Pinites eggensis was not considered by Doweld and did not threaten Pitys. They commented that the distinction between Pinites and Peuce Lindley & W. Hutton, 1832 "was likely a preservational artefact" but that no formal synonymization had yet been proposed; that being the case, the genus in IRMNG is placed in Araucariaceae (as per Peuce); the latter is presently treated as a synonym of Agathoxylon, per Rößler et al., 2014. However, Philippe & Bamford, 2008 state that the lectotype is Cordaitalean. (Not further researched) [details] |
