IRMNG taxon details
original description
Arch. Protistenk., 32, 4, 52 page(s): 74 [details]
basis of record
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details]
basis of record
SN2000/Patterson et al., 2000 [details]
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
verified source for family
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2016). Higher classification and phylogeny of Euglenozoa. <em>European Journal of Protistology.</em> 56: 250-276., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2016.09.003 [details]
name verified source
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
current name source
WoRMS (Mar 2013) [details]
extant flag source
SN2000/Patterson et al., 2000 [details]
habitat flag source
Aphia 2006 [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Includes marine species (Aphia 2006) [details]
Taxonomic remark From Cavalier-Smith, 2016: "Initially considered a dinoflagellate (Scherfell 1900) or euglenoid relative (Griessmann 1913), ultrastructure showed many similarities to kinetoplastids (Elbrächter et al. 1996), as Senn (1911) supposed. Simpson (1997) suspected it was a diplonemid; Yabuki and Tame (2015) confirmed this by rDNA sequencing and suggested it merits a new family." [details]
|