| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsDannyelfakharikukri Hoser, 2012
1480881 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1480881)
unaccepted
Genus
recent only
Article title: A review of Kukri Snakes, currently referred to the genus Oligodon Fitzinger, 1826, with a division into twelve genera, four further subgenera and the creation of a tribe to accommodate them (Serpentes: Colubridae). [details]
Australasian Journal of Herpetology 13: -. [15-34] [details]
Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not...
Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Database, www.reptile-database.o [details]
IRMNG (2021). Dannyelfakharikukri Hoser, 2012. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1480881 on 2024-11-09
Date action by
original description
Article title: A review of Kukri Snakes, currently referred to the genus Oligodon Fitzinger, 1826, with a division into twelve genera, four further subgenera and the creation of a tribe to accommodate them (Serpentes: Colubridae). [details]
original description Australasian Journal of Herpetology 13: -. [15-34] [details] basis of record www.organismnames.com (Mar 2015) / web search [details] additional source As per current placement of type species [details] source of synonymy original publication/web search (AJR). [details] extant flag source inferred from original work (title) [details] habitat flag source inferred from original work (title)/web search (AJR) [details] Unreviewed
Classification Animalia;Chordata;Vertebrata;Reptilia;Lepidosauria;Squamata;Serpentes;Colubridae [details]Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Database, www.reptile-database.o [details] |
