| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsKlosevipera Hoser, 2013
1482026 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1482026)
unaccepted
Genus
recent only
Article title: African adders (Bitis Gray, 1842), reviewed, including, two new subgenera, five new species of Puff Adder, all formerly Bitis arietans (Merrem, 1820) subspecific division of Bitis caudalis (Smith, 1839) and division of the berg adders Bitis [details]
Australasian Journal of Herpetology 19: -. [3-24] [details]
Taxonomic remark As Bitis (Klosevipera). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the...
Taxonomic remark As Bitis (Klosevipera). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Database [details]
IRMNG (2021). Klosevipera Hoser, 2013. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1482026 on 2024-11-13
Date action by
original description
Article title: African adders (Bitis Gray, 1842), reviewed, including, two new subgenera, five new species of Puff Adder, all formerly Bitis arietans (Merrem, 1820) subspecific division of Bitis caudalis (Smith, 1839) and division of the berg adders Bitis [details]
original description Australasian Journal of Herpetology 19: -. [3-24] [details] basis of record www.organismnames.com (Mar 2015) / web search [details] additional source As per current placement of type species [details] source of synonymy original publication/web search (AJR). [details] extant flag source inferred from original work (title) [details] habitat flag source inferred from original work (title)/web search (AJR) [details] Unreviewed
Classification Animalia;Chordata;Vertebrata;Reptilia;Lepidosauria;Squamata;Serpentes;Viperidae [details]Taxonomic remark As Bitis (Klosevipera). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Database [details] |
