| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsWellsboa Hoser, 2013
1485043 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1485043)
unaccepted
Genus
recent only
Article title: A reassessment of the Tropidophiidae, including the creation of two new tribes and the division of Tropidophis Bibron, 1840 into six genera, and a revisiting of the Ungaliophiinae to create two subspecies within Ungaliophis panamensis Schmi [details]
Australasian Journal of Herpetology 17: -. [22-34] [details]
Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not...
Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Database, www.reptile-database.o [details]
IRMNG (2021). Wellsboa Hoser, 2013. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1485043 on 2024-11-21
Date action by
original description
Article title: A reassessment of the Tropidophiidae, including the creation of two new tribes and the division of Tropidophis Bibron, 1840 into six genera, and a revisiting of the Ungaliophiinae to create two subspecies within Ungaliophis panamensis Schmi [details]
original description Australasian Journal of Herpetology 17: -. [22-34] [details] basis of record www.organismnames.com (Mar 2015) / web search [details] additional source As per current placement of type species [details] source of synonymy original publication/web search (AJR). [details] extant flag source inferred from original work (title) [details] habitat flag source inferred from original work (title)/web search (AJR) [details] Unreviewed
Classification Animalia;Chordata;Vertebrata;Reptilia;Lepidosauria;Squamata;Serpentes;Tropidophiidae [details]Taxonomic remark Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Database, www.reptile-database.o [details] |
