Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Otavia Brain et al., 2012 †

1483123  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1483123)

 unaccepted > nomen nudum (pseudofossil)
Genus
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
fossil only
Article title: The first animals: ca. 760-million-year-old sponge-like fossils from Namibia. [details]   

South African Journal of Science 108: -. [83-90] [details]   
Taxonomic remark Described as "sponge-like", however Poriferan affinity is rejected by Antcliffe et al., 2014, who interpret the objects as...  
Taxonomic remark Described as "sponge-like", however Poriferan affinity is rejected by Antcliffe et al., 2014, who interpret the objects as non-biotic ("calciphosphate grains that have been pitted by sediment reworking"). [details]
IRMNG (2024). Otavia Brain et al., 2012 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1483123 on 2024-03-19
Date
action
by
2016-01-05 23:00:00Z
created
2019-04-02 18:22:59Z
changed
2019-12-04 02:56:44Z
changed
2024-02-05 04:35:12Z
changed
2024-02-05 17:21:10Z
changed

original description Article title: The first animals: ca. 760-million-year-old sponge-like fossils from Namibia. [details]   

original description South African Journal of Science 108: -. [83-90] [details]   

basis of record www.organismnames.com (Mar 2015) / web search [details]   

status source Antcliffe, J. B.; Callow, R. H. T.; Brasier, M. D. (2014). Giving the early fossil record of sponges a squeeze. <em>Biological Reviews.</em> 89(4): 972-1004., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12090 [details]   

verified source for family Antcliffe, J. B.; Callow, R. H. T.; Brasier, M. D. (2014). Giving the early fossil record of sponges a squeeze. <em>Biological Reviews.</em> 89(4): 972-1004., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12090 [details]   

extant flag source inferred from original work (title) [details]   

habitat flag source inferred from original work (title)/web search (AJR) [details]   
From other sources
Taxonomic remark Described as "sponge-like", however Poriferan affinity is rejected by Antcliffe et al., 2014, who interpret the objects as non-biotic ("calciphosphate grains that have been pitted by sediment reworking"). [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»